Next week, vapers in Madison, Wisconsin will be fighting a proposed amendment to that city's smoking ordinance, which adds the use of vapor products to the definition of "smoking." This will ban the use of all vapor products anywhere smoking is prohibited.
On the surface, this may not seem like a big deal to most vapor consumers. Most experienced vapers either don't find it necessary to vape where smoking is prohibited or can easily vape discreetly enough to go unnoticed. However, the reason I oppose these bans has nothing to do with any desire to vape in an Applebee's or at a Home Depot. My concern is the unintended consequences of such bans to overall public health.
My views on tobacco and nicotine consumer issues, nanny state policies, Libertarian viewpoints, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other random topics that pop up.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Saturday, December 6, 2014
Are e-cigarettes the new condom?
For anyone who is under the age of 30, you may not remember the
time when condom advertising barely existed, let alone cheeky commercials
playing over and over on late-night television. The understanding we have today
of safe sex practices were actually quite controversial even in an age when HIV/AIDS
was at the height of public fear.
The debate
The debate
Back in the 1980's, it was the
left-leaning progressives (then called "liberals") who led the
charge for "harm reduction" practices. Supported by Democrat
lawmakers, academics and scientists, the public health groups at the time argued that the public needed to be
educated about using condoms to significantly reduce the risk of HIV and other
STDs. They encouraged Sex Ed teachers to tell high school students that, if
they decided not to remain abstinent, to at least use a condom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)